Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 246/2023

Case between Union Bank of India vs Ajitha Joy Homes regarding Suit for realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-02-03
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Plaintiff is Union Bank of India suing the defendant, Ajitha Joy Homes, for recovery of a loan under the Pradhan Manthri Mudra Yojana Scheme. Defendant defaulted on repayment and sold hypothecated assets without permission, making recovery impossible.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Plaintiff is entitled to recover outstanding loan amount with interest and costs from the defendant and his assets.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Union Bank of India (Age not specified years) 239, Vidhan Bhawan Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021

Defendants

Ajitha Joy Homes (45 years) Joy Homes Kothedath, Thripunithura, Ernakulam-682 301

Reliefs

Relief Type: Money Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Realize Rs.6,46,750.57/- from the defendant and from his assets
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.6,46,750.57/- (Rupees six lakhs forty six thousand seven hundred and fifty and five seven paisa only) from the defendant and from his assets
Relief Type: Interest Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Realize interest at different rates per annum from the defendant's assets
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum, 6% per annum for Rs.6,46,750.57/- (Rupees six lakhs forty six thousand seven hundred and fifty and five seven paisa only) from the date of suit till date of decree from the defendant and from his assets
Relief Type: Costs Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendants and their assets
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendants and their assets

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original demand promissory note dated 01.03.2019
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Letter of Continuity
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter of continuity dated 01.03.2019
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter of interest reset agreement for MCLR loans
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter of interest reset agreement for MCLR loans dated 01.03.2019
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Term loan agreement with Hypothecation of movables
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Term loan agreement with Hypothecation of movables dated 01.03.2019
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Letter of undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter of undertaking dated 01.03.2019
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Letter of composite Debit Balance confirmation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter of composite Debit Balance confirmation dated 25.02.2022
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer's notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer's notice dated 16.01.2023
Reference:
Ext.A7

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases