Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 650/2017

Case between Umaira vs Ajeesa regarding realisation of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-07-08
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Umaira, filed a suit for the realisation of money against the defendant, Ajeesa. The case was ultimately settled through a mediation session, where both parties reached a compromise.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the compromise reached between the parties and decreed the suit in its terms. The court fees paid by the plaintiffs will be refunded.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Compromise accepted and suit decreed in its terms.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the compromise reached between the parties and decreed the suit in its terms. The court fees paid by the plaintiffs will be refunded.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties adjusted the plaint claim as a whole by the said compromise.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The parties adjusted the plaint claim as a whole by the said compromise.
Supporting Evidence
I have gone through the compromise and I am satisfied that the parties had adjusted the plaint claim as a whole by the said compromise.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms. Let the compromise form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Umaira
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ajeesa
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jyothi Sagar V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Deepesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Manoj
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G.S.Kavitha
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in its terms based on the compromise reached in mediation.
Evidence:
the parties had adjusted the plaint claim as a whole by the said compromise. Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Umaira vs Ajeesa regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Umaira vs Ajeesa regarding realisation of money

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won