Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 182/2024

Case between T.V. Devaprasad vs View Point Life Styles et al regarding Eviction

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-07-19
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

T.V. Devaprasad, the petitioner, seeks eviction of View Point Life Styles and its partners for non-payment of rent. The petitioner claims a genuine need to use the building for his own business and indicates that the respondents have not conducted business there.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for eviction, directing the respondents to vacate the premises within 30 days. The petitioner is also entitled to the costs of the petition.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.
Case Type
Eviction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the petitioner's claim for eviction due to non-payment of rent justified and his need legitimate.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act with costs as follows: The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

T.V. Devaprasad (71 years years) Tharayil House, Vyttila P.O., Kochi-682019

Defendants

View Point Life Styles (Age not specified years) C.C. 29/783A, ground floor, Tharayil Chambers, N.H.-Bypass, Vyttila P.O., Kochi-19 E. Jafar Khan (Age not specified years) Flat No. 801-A (4-97B-103), City green view apartments, Moodusagrai, Uduppi, Karnataka, PIN-576102 Mini Jafar Khan (Age not specified years) Thundathil Kizhakethil House, Kannamcode, Adoor, PIN-691523

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act with costs.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Printout of building tax receipt dated 20.07.2024, rejected due to lack of certification.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lease Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of lease deed No. 697/2013 of Maradu SRO dated 06.03.2013, marked in evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Office copy of lawyer's notice dated 05.11.2024, marked in evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original acknowledgment card dated 07.11.2024, marked in evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Returned Postal Envelopes
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original returned postal envelopes (3 in numbers) along with receipt and acknowledgment card, marked in evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases