Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 54/2025

Case between Mary Philomina P.G. vs Harisree Trading Company regarding Eviction

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-07-25
Duration
approximately-3 years 5 months 9 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mary Philomina P.G. filed a petition for eviction against Harisree Trading Company due to non-payment of rent and failure to occupy the leased premises. The court found that the respondent did not present any evidence to counter the petitioner's claims.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for eviction as the respondent failed to appear or present any defense against the claims of unpaid rent. Consequently, the petitioner was granted possession of the premises.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.
Case Type
Eviction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the evidence presented by the petitioner to be clear and uncontradicted.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(4)(v) of the Act as follows: The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mary Philomina P.G. (60 years years) Illathuparambil House, House No. 54/3455, Ambady Lane, Kadavanthra P.O., PIN-682020, Elamkulam village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District

Defendants

Harisree Trading Company (Age not specified years) Door No.64/2623 (Old No. C.C.36/2405C2), 1st Floor, V. Tower, K.K. Road, Kaloor, Kochi -682017

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days.
Evidence:
In the result, The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(4)(v) of the Act as follows:- The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of legal notice dated 11.03.2025 sent to the respondent demanding payment of rent arrears.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Returned Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of returned cover with the endorsement 'addressee left' containing the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of acknowledgment card dated 14.03.2025 signed by K.V. Rajan.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 02/16/2022 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases