Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.O.P. No.7/2024

Case between Demina Varghese vs Neduparambil Credit Syndicate regarding eviction

Court
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER/ MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-04-09
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Demina Varghese filed a petition for eviction against Neduparambil Credit Syndicate for defaulting on rent payments. The respondent was absent and the case proceeded as ex-parte.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the eviction petition, ordering the respondent to surrender the vacant possession of the petition schedule room. The respondent was also required to pay the arrears of rent within one month.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the respondent from the petition schedule room.
Case Type
Eviction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented was unchallenged, indicating that the petitioner was entitled to the relief sought.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, petition is allowed with costs as follows: The respondent is directed to surrender the vacant possession of the petition schedule room under Sec. 11(2) (b) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Demina Varghese (49 years years) Painadathu House, Perumbavoor P.O., Iringole Kara, Perumbavoor Village, Pin : 683542

Defendants

Neduparambil Credit Syndicate (Age not specified years) Registered Office, Plantthottam Complex Thiruvalla P.O., Pin : 689101

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to surrender the vacant possession of the petition schedule room.
Evidence:
In the result, petition is allowed with costs as follows: The respondent is directed to surrender the vacant possession of the petition schedule room under Sec. 11(2) (b) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the ownership of the petitioner over the petition schedule room.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lease Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document details the rental terms under which the respondent occupied the petition schedule room.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as formal notification to the respondent about the termination of the rent arrangement.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides proof of sending the lawyer notice to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is evidence of receipt related to the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Unserved Registered Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These documents indicate attempts to serve notice that were not successful.
Reference:
Ext.A6 and Ext.A7
Document Type: Paper publication
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These documents provide evidence of the publication intended to notify the respondent about the proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.A8 and Ext.A9

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases