Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O. S. No.45/2019

Case between Saju K V vs Kerala State Beverages (Manufacturing and Marketing) Corporation Ltd regarding realisation of arrears of rent.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-10-30
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a dispute between Saju K V and the Kerala State Beverages Corporation over unpaid rent for two shop buildings leased for a liquor outlet. The plaintiff claims rent arrears, while the defendant denies a valid rental agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that no valid lease existed between the parties, leading to the dismissal of the plaintiff's suit for arrears of rent. The plaintiff was deemed not entitled to recover the claimed amount.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court concluded no enforceable lease existed based on the evidence presented.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed. Parties shall bear their own costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Saju K V (46 years years) Kaniyadan House, Rayamangalam Kara, Rayamangalam Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Ernakulam

Defendants

Kerala State Beverages (Manufacturing and Marketing) Corporation Ltd (Age not specified years) Bevco Tower, Palayam Kara, Palayam Village, Thiruvananthapuram Taluk, Pin: 695 033

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff's request to recover arrears of rent.
Evidence:
Consequently, Exhibit A8 remains an unproved photocopy of a unilateral offer, devoid of probative value under the Evidence Act.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Consent letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Produced to show willingness to let out two rooms for the FL-1 outlet.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Judgment Copy
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cited to support the plaintiff's claim regarding local protests obstructing the outlet's operation.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Produced to establish the demand for payment from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Clarified the defendant's response to the plaintiff's claims.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another notice demanding payment before the suit was filed.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirmation of correspondence sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: A/d Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the correspondence proof to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Licence
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Indicates the licensing context of the case, relevant to the defendant's operations.
Reference:
Ext.X1
Document Type: Consent letter
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Departmental communication relevant to the lease context.
Reference:
Ext.X2
Document Type: Residential/Ownership Certificate
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Establishes property ownership relevant to the suit.
Reference:
Ext.X2(a)
Document Type: Agreement Form
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Documentation related to the liquor outlet's operational requirements.
Reference:
Ext.X2(b)
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Proof of ownership and owner dues related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.X2(c)
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Another proof related to ownership and dues.
Reference:
Ext.X2(d)
Document Type: Possession Certificate
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Relevant for proving tenancy or occupation aspects.
Reference:
Ext.X2(e)
Document Type: Consent letter
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Another departmental communication that is relevant for context.
Reference:
Ext.X3
Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Details the sanction order regarding the liquor outlet's location.
Reference:
Ext.X4

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases