Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 140/2023

Case between M. D Antony vs M/s. Indus Towers Ltd. regarding recovery of possession and arrears of rent

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-03-06
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M. D Antony, is seeking recovery of possession of leased premises and arrears of rent from the defendant, M/s. Indus Towers Ltd. The suit arises from allegations that the defendant has defaulted on rent payments after the lease term expired.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the suit was not properly valued and directed the plaintiff to amend the plaint with the correct valuation and to pay any deficit court fee by a specified date.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's claim was not properly valued according to legal standards.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, I am of the opinion, in view of Section 12(2) of the Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act, that the plaintiff is to furnish fresh valuation. The plaint shall be amended accordingly and the deficit court fee is to be paid after the proper valuation carried out in accordance with the valuation fixed on rent at the rate of 60,598.94/-.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M. D Antony (42 years years) Maliakkal, Ponekkara, AIMS P.O, Kochi – 41

Defendants

M/s. Indus Towers Ltd. (Age not specified years) 8th Floor Vankarath Towers, NH-47, Palarivattom, Kochi – 682 025

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
The suit is to be amended to incorporate the proper valuation and the deficit fee to be paid.
Evidence:
Hence, I am of the opinion, in view of Section 12(2) of the Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act, that the plaintiff is to furnish fresh valuation.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases