Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1222/2022

Case between Dr. Satish Bhat vs K S Vinod regarding eviction and recovery of arrears of rent

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-06-30
Duration
approximately-8 years 11 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Dr. Satish Bhat filed a suit against K S Vinod for eviction from a leased property, recovery of unpaid rent, and damages for unauthorized occupation. The case arose after the lease expired and the defendant continued to occupy the property without payment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the defendant to vacate the property and awarded the plaintiff arrears of rent of Rs. 1,93,759/- along with damages for use and occupation. The relief was granted due to the defendant's failure to pay rent after the lease expired.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of defendant and recovery of arrears of rent and damages for occupation.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The lease agreement had expired, and the defendant had not made payments as required under the lease terms.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, defendant is hereby directed to surrender vacant possession of plaint schedule property. Plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs. 1,93,759/- towards arrears of rent with 12% from date of suit till realization.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Dr. Satish Bhat (49 years) 9B, Yasoram Tejus Apartments, High School Road, Vennala P O, Ernakulam- 682028

Defendants

K S Vinod (47 years) 1A, Tanzeel Apartment, Kumaranasan Nagar, Kadavanthara P O, Ernakulam- 682020

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought eviction of the defendant from the property.
Evidence:
Defendant is hereby directed to surrender vacant possession of plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff claimed arrears of rent amounting to Rs.1,93,759/-.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.1,93,759/- towards arrears of rent with 12% from date of suit till realization.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff claimed damages for use and occupation of the property.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.40,262/- as damages for use and occupation.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff seeks costs from the defendant.
Evidence:
The court does not find any reason for not awarding costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lease Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The lease deed establishes the terms of the lease agreement between the plaintiff and defendant, including the rental amount and duration of the lease.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice demands the defendant pay the outstanding arrears of rent, which is pivotal to the plaintiff's claims.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This email is a printout pertaining to the communications regarding payment disputes between the parties.
Reference:
Ext.A3(a)
Document Type: Certification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This certification relates to the legal notices and communications, supporting the plaintiff's claims.
Reference:
Ext.A3(b)
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another notice demanding payment of arrears, reinforcing the plaintiff's arguments in court.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The reply notice discusses the defendant's response to the allegations of non-payment of rent.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This email printout again reflects the back-and-forth communications regarding lease renewal and payment issues.
Reference:
Ext.A6(a)
Document Type: Certification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to prior emails and correspondences, providing legal backing to the issues presented.
Reference:
Ext.A6(b)
Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This email depicts the refusal of the plaintiff to renew the lease, which is critical to the eviction claim.
Reference:
Ext.A7(a)
Document Type: Certification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides legal certification for the email communications between the parties.
Reference:
Ext.A7(b)
Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
An order relevant to this case, mentioned in the context of enforcement and proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Lease Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The lease agreement provides the basis of the property rights and liabilities of the parties involved.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Nil
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
No documents were submitted by the defendant in support of their claims.
Reference:
Document Type: Nil
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
No documents are included from the court's side in the judgment.
Reference:
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Witness
Relevance:
The claim was supported by oral evidence from the plaintiff's witness.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 08/01/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases