Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 140/2019

Case between Smt. Bindu David et al vs Denson Xavier regarding Eviction.

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-07-18
Duration
approximately-5 years
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Smt. Bindu David and others, who are the petitioners, filed for eviction against Denson Xavier, the respondent, for illegal occupation and construction in a leased property. The case involves claims of unauthorized structural changes affecting the property's value and utility.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petitioners' application for eviction against the respondent based on unauthorized alterations and illegal occupancy. The respondent has been ordered to vacate the premises within 30 days.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is directed to surrender possession of the property within 30 days.
Case Type
Eviction
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petitioners' application for eviction against the respondent based on unauthorized alterations and illegal occupancy. The respondent has been ordered to vacate the premises within 30 days.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners established that the respondent made permanent alterations without consent that materially diminished the value and utility of the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioners established that the respondent made permanent alterations without consent that materially diminished the value and utility of the property.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence presented by the petitioners, including a commission report, showed that the alterations made by the respondent significantly diminished the value and utility of the building.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed under section 11(4)(ii) of the Act as follows; i. The respondent is hereby directed to put the petitioners/landlords in possession of petition schedule building within 30 days from the date of order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Smt. Bindu David
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o. Late David George
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sri. George David
Party Age
26
Relation
S/o. Late David George
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sri. John David
Party Age
22
Relation
W/o. Late David George
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Denson Xavier
Relation
S/o A.M. Xavier
Plaintiffs Documents
Original of the rent agreement dated 08.12.2004, Notice issued from the office of the Town Planning Officer of the Municipal Corporation of Cochin dated 28.05.2019, Receipt issued by Municipal Corporation of Cochin dated 26.03.2019, Legal notice dated 29.07.2019.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kabil Chandran T.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anjali R.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Navod Prasannan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.V. Krishnakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Manoj Kumar M.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Eviction of the respondent from the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed under section 11(4)(ii) of the Act as follows; The respondent is hereby directed to put the petitioners/landlords in possession of petition schedule building within 30 days from the date of order.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioners are entitled to recover costs of the proceedings from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioners are entitled to get cost of the proceedings from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of rent agreement dated 08.12.2004 establishing the terms of the lease.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Notice from Municipal Corporation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of the notice dated 28.05.2019 issued from the office of the Town Planning Officer of the Municipal Corporation of Cochin regarding unauthorized construction.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original receipt issued by Municipal Corporation of Cochin dated 26.03.2019.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the legal notice dated 29.07.2019 issued by the petitioners to the respondent demanding vacation of the premises.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Envelope containing Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original envelope containing the legal notice dated 29.07.2019 issued to the respondent and returned to the petitioners.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of the reply notice dated 16.08.2019 sent by the respondent to the petitioners in response to the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report dated 05.10.2019 detailing the structural conditions of the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Photographs
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Original photographs accompanying the commission report evidencing the condition of the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Eviction
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
Case between Smt. Bindu David et al vs Denson Xavier regarding Eviction.
Case Code Year
Case between Smt. Bindu David et al vs Denson Xavier regarding Eviction.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 07/29/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between P.P. Fathima vs Haji Abdul Latheef P. Mukri et al regarding eviction
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Eviction Plaintiff Won
Case between Parvathy Antharajanam et al vs Annie Varghese et al regarding eviction
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Eviction Plaintiff Won
Case between Demina Varghese vs Neduparambil Credit Syndicate regarding eviction
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER/ MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Eviction Plaintiff Won
Case between Bose John vs SNA Oushadhasala Pvt. Ltd et al regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Josemon George vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding rent enhancement and injunction
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won