Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 88/2025

Case between Jacob Vadakel vs Mr. V P Jackson regarding eviction under Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act.

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-12-06
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jacob Vadakel, the petitioner, seeks eviction of Mr. V P Jackson, the respondent, for non-payment of rent according to their lease agreement. The petitioner claims a bona fide need for the building to run his interior design business.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the eviction petition under Sections 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act. The respondent is directed to vacate the premises within 30 days.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days.
Case Type
Eviction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner complied with the legal requirements under the Act for eviction due to non-payment of rent.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed u/S. 11(2)(b) and 11 (3) of the Act with costs as follows: 1. The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Jacob Vadakel (50 years years) Vadakel House, PERA-87, Pulikkillam East road, Chembumukku, Kochi - 682030

Defendants

Mr. V P Jackson (60 years years) Vadakkumpadam House, VERA 20, Vattekkat road, Kaloor, Kochi - 682 017

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner seeks eviction of the respondent from the premises due to non-payment of rent.
Evidence:
Hence, the petition is allowed u/S. 11(2)(b) and 11 (3) of the Act with costs.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to demonstrate that a formal notice requesting payment of arrears was sent to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as proof of delivery of the lawyer's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original National Trade certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports the petitioner's claim of running a business requiring the premises.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Original mark sheet
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides evidence of the petitioner's credentials related to the business.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Original partnership deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the petitioner's business entity.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases