Case Summary
Three plaintiffs filed original suit against two defendants seeking injunction, but as the plaintiff's counsel had no instruction, the suit was dismissed with costs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Injunction - Dismissed
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed with costs due to the absence of instructions from the plaintiff's counsel.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- T.R. Ananthanarayanan
- Party Age
- 56
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Prakash. R
- Party Age
- 40
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdul Khadar
- Party Age
- 45
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vettan Bava Haji
- Party Age
- 60
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Medambath Thottathil Muhammed
- Party Age
- 50
Plaintiffs Documents
Unknown
Defendants Documents
Unknown
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.V. Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K. Vipin
- Appearance Type
- Unknown
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. M.K. Jyothi
- Appearance Type
- Unknown
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.A. Ismail
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Request for injunction dismissed
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed with costs.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between T.R. Ananthanarayanan et al vs Vettan Bava Haji et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between T.R. Ananthanarayanan et al vs Vettan Bava Haji et al regarding injunction