Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RCP 3/2025

Case between T.K.Raveendran vs Chandrabose regarding settlement in mediation

Court
RENT CONTROL COURT, VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-07-30
Duration
Case Code No.
3
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

T.K.Raveendran is the petitioner and Chandrabose is the respondent. The case involves a petition that was finally heard on the matter of settling disputes through mediation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition in terms of the compromise agreement reached between the parties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petition allowed in terms of compromise agreement
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition in terms of the compromise agreement reached between the parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The compromise petition was found to be lawful and the terms of agreement were accepted.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Terms of agreement found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence petition allowed in terms of compromise agreement. Compromise agreement shall form part of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
T.K.Raveendran
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chandrabose
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R.Gaganan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.Krishnakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Malu Johnson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sangeetha Thankachan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Dhanya K.G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petition allowed in terms of compromise agreement.
Evidence:
Hence petition allowed in terms of compromise agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
RCP
Case Code Year
2025

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Vaikom
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Mrs.Sumitha R vs Mr.Shibu P.K. regarding Rent control petition
RENT CONTROL COURT
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Santhappan vs Sarvarthan regarding Rent Control.
RENT CONTROL COURT
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Santhappan vs Rameshan regarding rent control petition.
RENT CONTROL COURT
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Santhappan vs Subhash regarding rent control dispute.
RENT CONTROL COURT
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Jose Mathew et al vs Thomas John regarding possession of a building
Court of the Rent Controller, Kottayam
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won