Case Summary
Santhappan, the petitioner, sought relief through this Rent Control petition against Sarvarthan, the respondent. The court ultimately dismissed the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition as abated.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Therefore Original Petition also dismissed as abated.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Santhappan
- Party Age
- 74
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sarvarthan
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.S.Renjith
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.P.Muraleedharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Original Petition dismissed as abated.
Evidence:
Therefore Original Petition also dismissed as abated.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Santhappan vs Sarvarthan regarding Rent Control.
Case Code Year
Case between Santhappan vs Sarvarthan regarding Rent Control.