Case Summary
Santhappan, aged 74, filed a rent control petition against Rameshan, aged 55. The court heard the petition and subsequently dismissed it as abated.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the original petition as abated.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence Original Petition dismissed as abated.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Santhappan
- Party Age
- 74
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rameshan
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.S.Renjith
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.P.Muraleedharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Original Petition dismissed as abated
Evidence:
Hence Original Petition dismissed as abated.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Santhappan vs Rameshan regarding rent control petition.
Case Code Year
Case between Santhappan vs Rameshan regarding rent control petition.