Case Summary
Santhappan, aged 74, filed a petition against Subhash regarding a rent control issue. The court has dismissed the original petition as abated.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed as abated by the court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence Original Petition dismissed as abated.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Santhappan
- Party Age
- 74
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Subhash
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.S.Renjith
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.P.Muraleedharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Original Petition dismissed as abated.
Evidence:
Hence Original Petition dismissed as abated.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Santhappan vs Subhash regarding rent control dispute.
Case Code Year
Case between Santhappan vs Subhash regarding rent control dispute.