Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 200 OF 2014

Case between Thurakkal Unneenkutty vs Pathutty and Puthuvalli Muhammed regarding fixation of boundary

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V., B.A, LL.B.
Order Date
2018-03-26
Duration
4 years 21 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Thurakkal Unneenkutty filed a suit against Pathutty and Puthuvalli Muhammed seeking to fix the boundary between their properties as there was a dispute regarding the boundary after the defendants obstructed the plaintiff's construction of a wall on the determined boundary.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that RAB line in Ext.C4 plan is the Eastern boundary of the plaintiff's property and ordered the defendants to pay the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Fixation of Eastern boundary of plaint A schedule property
Case Type
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff had a definite cause of action as the defendants obstructed the construction of the wall on the determined boundary, and the Advocate Commissioner's reports supported the plaintiff's claim.

Judgment Evidence:

I hold a view that the plot PQCBARP in Ext.C4 plan is the plaint A schedule property.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Thurakkal Unneenkutty (62 years) Thurakkal House, Melmuri amsom desom, Kadampuzha, Uruliyankunnu, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Pathutty (Age not specified years) Puthuvalli House, Melmuri amsom desom, Thuvvapara, Tirur Taluk Puthuvalli Muhammed (Age not specified years) Puthuvalli House, Melmuri amsom desom, Thuvvapara, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Boundary Fixation
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Fixation of Eastern boundary of plaint A schedule property
Evidence:
I hold a view that the plot PQCBARP in Ext.C4 plan is the plaint A schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition deed copy
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To show original ownership
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of property transfer
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Intimation from Surveyor
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of survey
Reference:
A3
Document Type: Receipts & Tax Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Financial transactions related to the property
Reference:
A4, A5(a)-A5(f)

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Thu, 03/20/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases