Case Summary
Two plaintiffs filed suit seeking partition against defendant, but since plaintiff was absent during the hearing, the suit was dismissed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not granted - Suit dismissed
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
The suit for partition was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not available
Reason not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for partition. Counsei for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called, absent. Hence suit is dismissed. (Pronounced by me in open court, this, the 9th day of January,2018)
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- ThandamValappil Nasar
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- S/o. Muhammed @ Bava
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thandam Valappil Kabeer
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- S/o. Muhammad @ Bava
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kundam Kandathil Kadeeja
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- W/o. Muhammed
Plaintiffs Documents
Not available
Defendants Documents
Not available
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Not granted - Suit dismissed
Description:
Seeking partition of property
Evidence:
Suit for partition. Counsei for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called, absent. Hence suit is dismissed. (Pronounced by me in open court, this, the 9th day of January,2018)
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Partition Dispute
Case Code
Case between ThandamValappil Nasar et al vs Kundam Kandathil Kadeeja regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between ThandamValappil Nasar et al vs Kundam Kandathil Kadeeja regarding partition