Case Summary
Plaintiff filed a suit for partition against defendants. The plaintiff failed to appear in court despite multiple chances, leading to the suit being dismissed for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
The suit for partition was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's repeated absence in court.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
No clear evidence provided for why the defendants won.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mandayappurath Harifa
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- Wife of
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mandayapurath Ammeerali
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mandayappurath Noushad
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nafeesumma
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P.K. Valsala
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Partition of assets between the parties
Evidence:
No steps seen taken even after repeated chances were given. No representation from the part of plaintiff.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Partition Dispute
Case Code
Case between Mandayappurath Harifa vs Mandayapurath Ammeerali et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Mandayappurath Harifa vs Mandayapurath Ammeerali et al regarding partition