Case Summary
Plaintiff filed suit against defendants seeking partition of property citing equal rights over the property and defendants' failure to make partition despite repeated demands.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition of property with 1 share to plaintiff
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the partition of the property, providing the plaintiff with 1 out of 4 shares in the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff's case was proven with reliable evidence as the defendants did not contest, allowing the court to grant the relief.
Plaintiff's case was proven with reliable evidence as the defendants did not contest, allowing the court to grant the relief.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff's case was proven with reliable evidence as the defendants did not contest, allowing the court to grant the relief.
Plaintiff's case was proven with reliable evidence as the defendants did not contest, allowing the court to grant the relief.
Supporting Evidence
As already stated defendants opted to remain exparte. Since the plaintiff proved his case with cogent and reliable evidence, he is entitled to have the decree as prayed for.
Judgment Evidence:
As already stated defendants opted to remain exparte. Since the plaintiff proved his case with cogent and reliable evidence, he is entitled to have the decree as prayed for.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sajeev
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kaliyammu
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mukesh
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sasikala
- Party Age
- 27
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Kudikidappu' certificate No. OA 264/74, Tax receipts from 03-07-2015 to 18-07-2017
Defendants Documents
Not available
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Gopi Kadavath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Partition of property with 1 share to plaintiff
Evidence:
As already stated defendants opted to remain exparte. Since the plaintiff proved his case with cogent and reliable evidence, he is entitled to have the decree as prayed for.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Kudikidappu' certificate
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of ownership of the property
Reference:
A1
Document Type:
Tax receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of tax payment and possession
Reference:
A2(a) - A2(e)
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Partition Dispute
Case Code
Case between Sajeev vs Kaliyammu et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Sajeev vs Kaliyammu et al regarding partition