Case Summary
Four plaintiffs filed a suit for partition against multiple defendants. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Suit dismissed
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
The suit for partition was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their representation.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for partition. The counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of plaintiffs are called absent. No representation. Hence suit is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Santha
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- Wife of Thekkepurakkal Ayyappan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thekkepurakkal Kuttithamu's Children
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thekkepurakkal Seethamma's Children
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thekkepurakkal Meenakshi's Children
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.V. Anu Raj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Noufel.P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Suit dismissed
Evidence:
The suit for partition was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their representation.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Partition Dispute
Case Code
Case between Santha et al vs Thekkepurakkal Kuttithamu's Children et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Santha et al vs Thekkepurakkal Kuttithamu's Children et al regarding partition