Case Summary
Thajudheen represented by his wife as Power of Attorney filed a suit for partition against Cheriya Beevi and others. The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and defendants.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
The suit for partition was dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thajudheen
- Relation
- Represented by Power of Attorney Holder, wife
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Cheriya Beevi
- Party Age
- 67
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Asyamol @ Kunhimol
- Party Age
- 50
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M. Neelakandan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S. Hariharan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Dinesh Pookayil
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Partition of property among the parties involved
Evidence:
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Partition Dispute
Case Code
Case between Thajudheen et al vs Cheriya Beevi et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Thajudheen et al vs Cheriya Beevi et al regarding partition