Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 522/2024

Case between Thajudeen Kunju et al vs Naseela et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A
Order Date
2025-09-26
Duration
approximately-1 year 3 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Thajudeen Kunju and Azeena, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Naseela, Minhaj, and Rasheed. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants have caused damage to the leased property and have failed to pay rent.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court partially decreed the suit, restraining the defendants from causing any damage to the plaint schedule shop room and allowing the plaintiffs to recover the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants are restrained from causing any damage to the plaint schedule shop room or making any alteration therein.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court partially decreed the suit, restraining the defendants from causing any damage to the plaint schedule shop room and allowing the plaintiffs to recover the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs succeeded in proving their case with sufficient evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs succeeded in proving their case with sufficient evidence.
Supporting Evidence
By producing Exts. A1, A3 to A5 and C1 series and by deposing in tune with the plaint averments in the affidavit, the plaintiffs have succeeded in proving their case. Moreover, there is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiffs.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, this suit is decreed in part as follows: (i) The defendants are restrained from causing any damage to the plaint schedule shop room or made any alteration therein.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thajudeen Kunju
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Azeena
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Naseela
Party Age
39
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Minhaj
Party Age
49
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rasheed
Party Age
48
Plaintiffs Documents
Land tax receipt dated 05/06/2024, Copy of building certificate dated 06/06/2024, License deed dated 13/02/2023, Receipt of petition No.906/2024 dated 15/05/2024, Copy of complaint dated 15/05/2024.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.Abubeker Kutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anwar shaw S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Amina H.Shamon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nil
Appearance Type
Case between Thajudeen Kunju et al vs Naseela et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction. > Case advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are restrained from causing any damage to the plaint schedule shop room or making any alteration therein.
Evidence:
In the result, this suit is decreed in part as follows: (i) The defendants are restrained from causing any damage to the plaint schedule shop room or made any alteration therein.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiffs are entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
Moreover, the plaintiffs are entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves ownership and possession of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Building Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes legal standing of the building.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: License Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the business operations of the defendants on the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Receipt of Petition
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the petition context related to the plaint schedule.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the issues faced by the plaintiffs regarding the defendants' actions.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Provides findings relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Thajudeen Kunju et al vs Naseela et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Thajudeen Kunju et al vs Naseela et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs Stanly John et al regarding restoration of EP.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Canara Bank, Kundara Branch vs Sheeja Das.S regarding Realisation of Money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Reena vs Stellamma regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs Rajappanachari regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won