OS. No. 839/2022

Case between Gopakumar vs Rajappanachari regarding Realisation of Money

Court

THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM

Judge

Smt. Ragi.S.

Order Date

2025-01-24

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a suit filed by the plaintiff, Gopakumar, against the defendant, Rajappanachari, for the realization of money. The court considered the case on January 24, 2025.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The judgment indicates that the plaintiff did not remit the balance court fee and there was no petition filed for an extension of time. As a result, the suit was rejected.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The judgment indicates that the plaintiff did not remit the balance court fee and there was no petition filed for an extension of time. As a result, the suit was rejected.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to fulfill a procedural requirement by not remitting the balance court fee.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to fulfill a procedural requirement by not remitting the balance court fee.

Supporting Evidence

The plaintiff represented. Balance Court Fee not remitted so far.

Judgment Evidence:

Plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Gopakumar
Party Age: 52
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Rajappanachari
Party Age: 64
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Rajeev. C.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery

Outcome: Refused

Description:

Plaintiff filed for Realisation of Money but the balance court fee was not remitted.

Evidence:

Balance Court Fee not remitted so far. No petition seen filed seeking extension of time. Plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification