Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 679/2024

Case between The Canara Bank, Kundara Branch vs Sheeja Das.S regarding Realisation of Money

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-01-13
Duration
approximately-2 years 8 months
Case Closed
Mon, 01/13/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, claims that the defendant, Sheeja Das, failed to repay a loan of Rs. 4,00,000. The plaintiff seeks to recover the outstanding amount due to non-payment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing recovery of Rs. 3,70,290.96 with interest from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs.3,70,290.96 with interest at the rate of 9.90% per annum
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing recovery of Rs. 3,70,290.96 with interest from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved their case through evidence that established the defendant's indebtedness.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved their case through evidence that established the defendant's indebtedness.
Supporting Evidence
The oral as well as documentary evidence adduced from the side of plaintiff bank clearly established that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff bank.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.3,70,290.96/- (Rupees Three Lakh Seventy Thousand Two Hundred and Ninety and Ninety Six paise only) with interest at the rate of 9.90% per annum from the date of the suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
The Canara Bank, Kundara Branch
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sheeja Das.S
Party Age
44
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Authorization Letter, Application for Loans, Sanction Memorandum, Agreement cum deed of hypothecation, Letter of Renewal, Legal Notice, Statement of accounts
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ajith A.Khader
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Law Firm
null
Bar Registration
null
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jasmine.M.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Law Firm
null
Bar Registration
null

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought to recover the outstanding loan amount.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.3,70,290.96/- with interest at the rate of 9.90% per annum.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff claimed costs for the suit.
Evidence:
Costs shall follow the event.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Authorization letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the plaintiff's authority to file the suit.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Application for Loans to Micro, Small & Medi cum Enterprises
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the loan application made by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as a record of the loan amount sanctioned to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the agreement between the parties regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Letter of renewal
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the renewal of the loan facility.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Letter of renewal
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another renewal document for the loan facility.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves notice to the defendant regarding the outstanding loan.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the legal notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms receipt of the legal notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the outstanding amount due from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A10

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between The Canara Bank, Kundara Branch vs Sheeja Das.S regarding Realisation of Money
Case Code Year
Case between The Canara Bank, Kundara Branch vs Sheeja Das.S regarding Realisation of Money

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Tue, 10/27/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 01/13/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Federal Bank Ltd. et al vs Benny Joseph et al regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Nusha S.N et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sarala et al regarding Realisation of Money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canara Bank et al vs M/s. Choice Fancy Center and Mobile Shop et al regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs Stanly John et al regarding restoration of EP.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won