Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 42/2024

Case between Sunilkumar S. vs Aneesh T.R. regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-10-23
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sunilkumar S. is the petitioner filing a rent control petition against Aneesh T.R., the respondent. The case involves the respondent vacating the premises and surrendering the keys.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decided to close the rent control petition as not pressed after the respondent vacated the building and surrendered the key.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court decided to close the rent control petition as not pressed after the respondent vacated the building and surrendered the key.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent vacated the premises and surrendered the keys.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent vacated the premises and surrendered the keys.
Supporting Evidence
The counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent vacated the building and surrendered the key.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the rent control petition is closed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sunilkumar S.
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aneesh T.R.
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Memo indicating the key surrender
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.K. Dileepan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.D. Vincent
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Deepak T. Nedungadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Karthik Menon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The rent control petition is closed as not pressed due to the respondent vacating the building and surrendering the key.
Evidence:
The counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent vacated the building and surrendered the key.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sunilkumar S. vs Aneesh T.R. regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Sunilkumar S. vs Aneesh T.R. regarding Rent Control Petition

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.B Gopalakrishnan vs Ms. Dilshana Siyad regarding Rent Control Petition
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Keecheri Sree Rama Varma Kerala Pattarya Samajam vs P.U. Rameshan regarding rent control compliance
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr. M.N Subramanian et al vs M/s Jigucheon Pvt Ltd et al regarding Rent Control Petition
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Hameed et al vs Shamsudheen et al regarding Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act, 1965
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown