Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 42/2024

Case between Sunilkumar S. vs Aneesh T.R. regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-10-23
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sunilkumar S. is the petitioner filing a rent control petition against Aneesh T.R., the respondent. The case involves the respondent vacating the premises and surrendering the keys.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decided to close the rent control petition as not pressed after the respondent vacated the building and surrendered the key.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent vacated the premises and surrendered the keys.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the rent control petition is closed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sunilkumar S. (58 years years) Classic­5, Choice Park, Perandoor road, Elamakkara P.O., Pin­682 026, Edappally south Village, Ernakkulam District

Defendants

Aneesh T.R. (37 years years) Mattappillil House, Vellikulangara, Monody Para, Pin­680 699, Thrissur District

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The rent control petition is closed as not pressed due to the respondent vacating the building and surrendering the key.
Evidence:
The counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent vacated the building and surrendered the key.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases