Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 116/2024

Case between Sunil Xavier vs M/s. Sara Salons Pvt Ltd. regarding rent compliance

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-07-23
Duration
approximately-1 month 6 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sunil Xavier filed a petition against M/s. Sara Salons Pvt Ltd. for non-compliance with a rent payment order. The respondent was absent during the proceedings, and the court found them liable for the failure to comply.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered to stop all further proceedings against the respondent due to their failure to comply with the rent payment order. The respondent must give vacant possession of the building to the petitioner immediately.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondent directed to give vacant possession of the building forthwith
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Respondent failed to comply with the order and did not show sufficient cause for non-compliance.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sunil Xavier (51 years years) Anjilikkal House, Muttathil Lane, Kadavanthra, Elamkulam Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam-682 020

Defendants

M/s. Sara Salons Pvt Ltd. (57 years years) C.C No. 37/1963 B1,1st Floor, Ozone Greens, Jawahar Nagar Road (North End). Jawahar Nagar, Elamkulam Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Kochi Municipal Corporation, Emakulam, Kochi-682 020

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court directed the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court referred to this order to discuss the compliance by the respondent.
Reference:
IA 7/2025
Document Type: Affidavit
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
The petitioner filed an affidavit of non-compliance of the order.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases