Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 14/2020

Case between Sunil J Chungath vs Baiju Y.P. regarding eviction under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act

Court
Court of the Third Additional Munsiff & Rent Controller
Judge
Sri. Reghunath N.S.
Order Date
2024-04-06
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sunil J Chungath, represented by his mother, sought the eviction of tenant Baiju Y.P. for failure to pay rent. The case revolves around arrears of rent and the terms of the rental agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, allowing the eviction of the respondent and ordering him to surrender possession of the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is directed to surrender vacant possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner proved the tenant's default in payment of rent.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed and the following orders are issued against the respondent. The respondent/tenant is directed to surrender vacant possession of the petition schedule building to the landlord/petitioner under Section 11(ii)(b) of the Act within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sunil J Chungath (40 years) Chungath, Valanjambalam, Ernakulam, Kochi-682 016 Alfo Joy (66 years) Chungath, Valanjambalam, Ernakulam, Kochi-682 016

Defendants

Baiju Y.P. (50 years) Thodiyil House, Mundakkal (M), Kollam, Pin-691 001

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent/tenant is directed to surrender vacant possession of the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed and the respondent/tenant is directed to surrender vacant possession of the petition schedule building to the landlord/petitioner under Section 11(ii)(b) of the Act within 30 days from today.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the petitioner in favour of PW1.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demanding the arrears of rent and asking for vacating the petition schedule building.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal A/D Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of receipt of the lawyer notice by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The response from the respondent to the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Print out of form 26A5
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To prove the fact that the monthly rent payable by the respondent is Rs. 14,586.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 02/01/2020 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases