Case Summary
Suhara filed a partition suit against Nishad.P.A., Ansar, and Mahin.P.A. for dividing the property. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit for partition was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff. The court noted that the plaintiff did not provide any instructions or representation.
Key Reasoning:
Suit dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent.
Suit dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent.
Why Defendant Won:
Suit dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent.
Suit dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent.
Supporting Evidence
Suit is one for Partition. Counsel for plaintiff reported no instruction. Plaintiff's name called absent. Suit dismissed for default.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Suhara
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nishad.P.A.
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ansar
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mahin.P.A.
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Gopi Kadavath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Munavar Fyrooz.K.P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Suhara vs Nishad.P.A., Ansar, Mahin.P.A. regarding Partition
Case Code Year
Case between Suhara vs Nishad.P.A., Ansar, Mahin.P.A. regarding Partition