Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 999/2023

Case between State Bank of India vs Mr. Sajayakumar K.S regarding realisation of money.

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-09-15
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

State Bank of India filed a suit against Mr. Sajayakumar K.S for the recovery of an outstanding loan amount. The defendant failed to appear and the bank proved its case for recovery.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the outstanding loan amount with interest. The suit was decreed due to the defendant's default in repayment.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of ₹3,88,023 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's case was proved through uncontested evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 3,88,023/- (Rupees three lakh eighty eight thousand twenty three only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

State Bank of India represented by its Manager (SARC) Indu T (46 years years) Retail Assets Centralised Processing Centre (RACPC), 1st Floor, Vankarath Towers, Pipeline Road, Bypass Junction, Palarivattom, Ernakulam 682 024.

Defendants

Mr. Sajayakumar K.S (46 years years) Kizhakkayil House, Chellarcoil P.O, Anakkara, Idukki – 685 509.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹3,88,023 from the defendant, with interest.
Evidence:
I am of the opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the same from the defendant, with interest from the date of suit.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Housing Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document relates to the loan application made by the defendant to the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Arrangement Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the arrangements made for the loan provided to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Memorandum of Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document records the terms of the loan agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides the financial details of the loan account for the specified period.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a formal notice sent to the defendant regarding the loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of sending the notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases