Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 739/2024

Case between State Bank of India vs Johnson PF regarding Balance Court Fee

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-03-22
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the State Bank of India as the plaintiff and Johnson PF as the defendant. The plaintiff sought to progress the case but faced issues with the non-payment of balance court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaint was rejected due to non-payment of the balance court fee by the plaintiff. The court noted that no application for extension of time was filed despite prior chances granted.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint was rejected due to non-payment of the balance court fee by the plaintiff. The court noted that no application for extension of time was filed despite prior chances granted.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to remit the required court fee despite multiple opportunities.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to remit the required court fee despite multiple opportunities.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff in the forenoon session had submitted that the application for enlargement of time to remit Balance Court Fee is being filed. However, when the case was taken up in the afternoon session also no such petition is seen filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, plaint is rejected for non-payment of Balance Court Fee.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
State Bank of India
Relation
represented by the Chief Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Johnson PF
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mumtaz Shumsuddin
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Alisha Aslam
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected for non-payment of Balance Court Fee.
Evidence:
Hence, plaint is rejected for non-payment of Balance Court Fee.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India vs Johnson PF regarding Balance Court Fee
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India vs Johnson PF regarding Balance Court Fee

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between State Bank of India vs Eldhose Varghese regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Leona Bags et al regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mohammed Ashique T K regarding recovery of loan
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between UNION BANK OF INDIA vs PREETHA MOHAN regarding attachment of movables
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs M/s Eleonore regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won