Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No.35/2023

Case between Sri.Sadananda Naik et al vs Smt. Sakeena regarding non-compliance of rent control order

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-08-13
Duration
approximately-1 month 9 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Sri.Sadananda Naik and others, filed a rent control petition against the respondent, Smt. Sakeena, due to her non-compliance with a previous rent order. The court determined that the respondent failed to comply with the order and directed her to vacate the premises.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found that the respondent did not comply with the required rent control order and thus, the court has taken measures to stop further proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the court's order and did not provide sufficient cause for non-compliance.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sri.Sadananda Naik (55 years years) H.no. CC 18/733, Alungal, Palluruthy, Kochi-682006, Ernakulam District Smt. Sreedevi. V.Shenoi (50 years years) H.no.CC 18/733, Alungal, Palluruthy, Kochi-682006, Ernakulam District Sri. S. Sreenivasa Naik (24 years years) H.no.CC 18/733, Alungal, Palluruthy, Kochi-682006, Ernakulam District

Defendants

Smt. Sakeena (Age not specified years) Kuttaparambil, Alapara, Kannara P.O., Peechi, Thrissur, Kerala, Pin-680652

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Order passed under section 12(3) of the Act stopping all further proceedings and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases