Case Summary
Plaintiffs represented by power of attorney holder filed an injunction suit against the defendants, seeking relief.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for injunction. The counsel for plaintiff has reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called. Absent. Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sreekandan Nair
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o. Appukuttan
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Santhanu. S. Nair
- Party Age
- 18
- Relation
- S/o. Sreekandan Nair
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Erampalliyil Siyad
- Party Age
- 35
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Krishnadas
- Party Age
- 32
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sreekandan Nair et al vs Erampalliyil Siyad et al regarding an injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sreekandan Nair et al vs Erampalliyil Siyad et al regarding an injunction