Case Summary
This case involves Sree Narayana Samskarika Samithi, the plaintiff, and Sasidharan.Syamala Mandiram, the 1st defendant. The plaintiff filed a petition for a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition filed by the 1st defendant for a review of the order has been allowed by the court, maintaining that not allowing it would cause irreparable loss.
Key Reasoning:
The court found it necessary to allow the petition under inherent powers to secure the ends of justice.
The court found it necessary to allow the petition under inherent powers to secure the ends of justice.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found it necessary to allow the petition under inherent powers to secure the ends of justice.
The court found it necessary to allow the petition under inherent powers to secure the ends of justice.
Supporting Evidence
Thus, this power can be invoked to do all things necessary to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of its process.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed. Considering the nature of the petition, there is no order as to costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sree Narayana Samskarika Samithi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sasidharan.Syamala Mandiram
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Prsanth B L
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- R.Bahuleyan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Reshmi S Nair
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petitioner sought a permanent prohibitory injunction.
Evidence:
Hence, I am inclined to allow the petition.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Court Order
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The plaintiff produced Ext.A12 to establish that the petitioner had disposed several vehicles of the school.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type:
Court Order
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court references Ext.A14 from the Hon'ble High Court regarding the limitations on the incumbent's decision-making.
Reference:
Ext.A14
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sree Narayana Samskarika Samithi vs Sasidharan.Syamala Mandiram regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sree Narayana Samskarika Samithi vs Sasidharan.Syamala Mandiram regarding permanent prohibitory injunction