Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No.158/2023

Case between Smt T.V Meenakshi Ammal vs S.N. Millen Khise regarding eviction

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-02-07
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition for eviction filed by Smt T.V Meenakshi Ammal against S.N. Millen Khise. The matter was settled, and vacant possession was handed over, leading to the dismissal of the petition.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition for eviction was dismissed as settled after the petitioner indicated they did not wish to proceed. Vacant possession was handed over.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Eviction
Final Judgment
No
The petition for eviction was dismissed as settled after the petitioner indicated they did not wish to proceed. Vacant possession was handed over.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Petitioner is represented. Matter settled. Vacant possession is handed over. The petitioner does not want to proceed with petition. A petition to that effect filed. Heard. petition is dismissed as settled.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Smt T.V Meenakshi Ammal
Party Age
72
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S.N. Millen Khise
Party Age
38
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.N. Manoj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner does not want to proceed with the petition as the matter is settled.
Evidence:
Matter settled. Vacant possession is handed over. The petitioner does not want to proceed with petition.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Eviction
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Smt T.V Meenakshi Ammal vs S.N. Millen Khise regarding eviction
Case Code Year
Case between Smt T.V Meenakshi Ammal vs S.N. Millen Khise regarding eviction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 02/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Babu. K. Putheth vs Muhammed Rameez M.J. regarding eviction under Section 11(2) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Eviction Plaintiff Won
Case between Renjini S. vs RaphiMon M.E. regarding eviction under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Eviction Plaintiff Won
Case between T.V. Devaprasad vs View Point Life Styles et al regarding Eviction
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Eviction Plaintiff Won
Case between Mary Philomina P.G. vs Harisree Trading Company regarding Eviction
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Eviction Plaintiff Won
Case between Jacob Vadakel vs Mr. V P Jackson regarding eviction under Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Eviction Plaintiff Won