Case Summary
Smt. Stella Paul filed a petition seeking eviction of the respondents from a building. The sole respondent had passed away and the additional respondents, being his legal heirs, did not claim any rights over the property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the respondents from the petition schedule building
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for eviction since the original tenant had passed away and the additional respondents did not claim any rights to the premises. The petitioner was granted the relief sought.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondents admitted they have no objection to granting the eviction relief.
The respondents admitted they have no objection to granting the eviction relief.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondents admitted they have no objection to granting the eviction relief.
The respondents admitted they have no objection to granting the eviction relief.
Supporting Evidence
The additional respondents No. 2 to 4 filed objection to the rent control petition stating that they have no objection in granting the relief as sought.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the rent control petition is allowed and the petitioner is entitled to get an order of eviction under Section 11(2)(b), 11(3) and 11(4)(v) of the Act.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Smt. Stella Paul
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- W/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sri. Issac
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mrs. Mareena
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- W/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mrs. Rose
- Party Age
- 23
- Relation
- D/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr. John
- Party Age
- 21
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Peter Tharakan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Francis Peter Tharakan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Manu Roy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Eliswa Saritha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Babu Cherukara
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Albert Abey V.S.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jees Matin
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- A.V. Shaji
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M. Sona Joy
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ann Mary Biju
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to get an order of eviction under Section 11(2)(b), 11(3) and 11(4)(v) of the Act.
Evidence:
the rent control petition is allowed and the petitioner is entitled to get an order of eviction under Section 11(2)(b), 11(3) and 11(4)(v) of the Act.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Smt. Stella Paul vs Sri. Issac et al regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act
Case Code Year
Case between Smt. Stella Paul vs Sri. Issac et al regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act