Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 47/2019

Case between Smt. M. Indiramma vs Sunitha Markose regarding possession of a building

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2024-05-18
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Smt. M. Indiramma, the petitioner, filed a rent control petition against Sunitha Markose. The petitioner seeks possession of a building, which the respondent has surrendered.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the joint compromise petition filed by both parties. The rent control petition was closed as it was found lawful.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the rent control petition is closed accordingly as it was found lawful. IA 01/2024 shall form part of the order.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Smt. M. Indiramma (74 years) Vembulassery, M.G. Road – 682 016

Defendants

Sunitha Markose (Age not specified years) “G.Q. Boutique”, Door No.62/1108, M.G. Road, Kochi–682016

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent has surrendered the vacant possession of the building to the petitioner as part of a compromise.
Evidence:
Counsel for plaintiff submits that the respondent has surrendered the vacant possession of the building to the petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Joint Compromise Petition
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
This document was filed by both parties indicating they have reached a compromise regarding the possession of the building.
Reference:
IA 01/2024

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases