Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 47/2019

Case between Smt. M. Indiramma vs Sunitha Markose regarding possession of a building

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2024-05-18
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Smt. M. Indiramma, the petitioner, filed a rent control petition against Sunitha Markose. The petitioner seeks possession of a building, which the respondent has surrendered.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the joint compromise petition filed by both parties. The rent control petition was closed as it was found lawful.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the joint compromise petition filed by both parties. The rent control petition was closed as it was found lawful.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Heard. Accepted, allowed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the rent control petition is closed accordingly as it was found lawful. IA 01/2024 shall form part of the order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Smt. M. Indiramma
Party Age
74
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sunitha Markose
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajagopalan A.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shyam V.K.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shaji Thankappan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent has surrendered the vacant possession of the building to the petitioner as part of a compromise.
Evidence:
Counsel for plaintiff submits that the respondent has surrendered the vacant possession of the building to the petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Joint Compromise Petition
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
This document was filed by both parties indicating they have reached a compromise regarding the possession of the building.
Reference:
IA 01/2024

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Smt. M. Indiramma vs Sunitha Markose regarding possession of a building
Case Code Year
Case between Smt. M. Indiramma vs Sunitha Markose regarding possession of a building

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 05/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Fri, 05/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Jojo Paul vs Maya Prasanth regarding eviction for non-payment of rent
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Mr. K. O. Joseph et al vs Mr. Abdul Sathar regarding non-compliance of rent order
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Rhine Biogenics (P) Ltd vs Century Associates regarding eviction and rent arrears
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kandathil Mathew Oommen vs Eljove C. Chummar regarding compliance with rent arrears.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won