Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.787/2024

Case between Sivapalan vs Sindhu, Prabhu T.D et al regarding Declaration and Injunction

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-08-22
Duration
approximately-1 year 18 days
Case Closed
Fri, 08/22/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff Sivapalan is seeking a declaration of title and permanent injunction against the defendants Sindhu, Prabhu T.D, and Prabhu Lal regarding a property. The plaintiff claims to be the sole legal heir of Padmini and is entitled to possession of the plaint schedule property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed, granting the plaintiff title and possession over the property, while permanently restraining the defendants from trespassing into it.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
It is declared that the plaintiff has title and possession over the plaint schedule property. The defendants are permanently restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed, granting the plaintiff title and possession over the property, while permanently restraining the defendants from trespassing into it.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff has established his claim as the sole legal heir entitled to the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff has established his claim as the sole legal heir entitled to the property.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff's case stands proved and unchallenged by the pleadings and evidences. Hence, the plaintiff is entitled to get the reliefs as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: i. It is declared that the plaintiff has title and possession over the plaint schedule property. ii. The defendants and their men are permanently restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from committing any waste therein.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sivapalan
Party Age
73
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sindhu
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prabhu T.D
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prabhu Lal
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Land Tax Receipt dated 28/08/2024, Partition Deed No. 1409/2014, Will Deed No. 102/11/III, Will Deed No. 103/11/III, Will Deed No. 108/2007, Sale Deed No. 2926/1993, Joint Right Release Deed No. 3653/1980, Partition Deed No. 5478/1972, Death Certificates of Padmini, Raghavan, Dhanapalan, Devarajan, and Sivani.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.Salimraj Mohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Declaration that the plaintiff has title and possession over the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
It is declared that the plaintiff has title and possession over the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permanent injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendants and their men are permanently restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the tax payment related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the partition among family members regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Will Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the bequest of property rights by Devarajan to Padmini.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Will Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of Padmini's bequest of property rights.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Will Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the transfer of property rights from Sivani to Padmini.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the sale of property share from Padmini to Devarajan and Sivani.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Release deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the release of rights of parties over the property.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the original partition of the family property.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the death of Padmini.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the death of Raghavan.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the death of Dhanapalan.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the death of Devarajan.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the death of Sivani.
Reference:
Ext.A13

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sivapalan vs Sindhu, Prabhu T.D et al regarding Declaration and Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sivapalan vs Sindhu, Prabhu T.D et al regarding Declaration and Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Thu, 08/22/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 08/22/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won