Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RP 181/2024 in OS 1170/2015

Case between Sivadasan Pillai vs Pushpakumari, Anil Kumar regarding restoration of suit

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S
Order Date
2025-11-07
Duration
approximately-3 years 10 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sivadasan Pillai, the plaintiff, filed a petition to restore a suit that was dismissed for default due to his absence caused by illness. The defendants are Pushpakumari and Anil Kumar, who did not file any objection.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petitions for condonation of delay and restoration of the suit due to lack of evidence to substantiate the claims made by the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petitions for condonation of delay and restoration of the suit due to lack of evidence to substantiate the claims made by the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
No evidence either oral or documentary was produced by the petitioner/plaintiff to substantiate his claim.
Why Defendant Won:
No evidence either oral or documentary was produced by the petitioner/plaintiff to substantiate his claim.
Supporting Evidence
There is absolutely no materials before the Court to show that the petitioner was prevented from filing a petition to restore the suit within the time prescribed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA 01/2024 and RP 181/2024 are dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sivadasan Pillai
Party Age
77
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pushpakumari
Party Age
54
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anil Kumar
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G.Gopakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Condonation of delay in filing RP 181/2024.
Evidence:
The delay of 897 days is not at all explained.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Restoration of the suit on file.
Evidence:
In view of my findings on point No.1, this point does not germane for consideration.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sivadasan Pillai vs Pushpakumari, Anil Kumar regarding restoration of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Sivadasan Pillai vs Pushpakumari, Anil Kumar regarding restoration of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Thu, 01/01/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won