Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ST.No. 154/2023

Case between Sindhu. S vs Deepak regarding offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

Court
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS – V
Judge
Smt. Sofia T.A.
Order Date
2025-07-14
Duration
approximately-6 years 10 days
Case Code No.
154
Case Closed
Mon, 07/14/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The complainant, Sindhu. S, alleges that the accused, Deepak, borrowed Rs. 8,00,000 and issued a cheque that was returned due to insufficient funds. The case was dismissed as the complainant failed to appear for evidence, indicating a lack of interest.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The complaint was dismissed and the accused, Deepak, was acquitted due to the absence of the complainant.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complaint was dismissed and the accused, Deepak, was acquitted due to the absence of the complainant.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant failed to appear for multiple hearings, showing lack of interest in the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The complainant failed to appear for multiple hearings, showing lack of interest in the case.
Supporting Evidence
In this case even after repeated postings and specific directions the complainant has not adduced any evidence so far.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result: The complaint is dismissed under section 256 (1) of Cr.P.C. and resultantly the accused is acquitted.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sindhu. S
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Deepak
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. R. Ramesh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.R. Manu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The complaint was dismissed under section 256(1) of Cr.P.C.
Evidence:
The complaint is dismissed under section 256 (1) of Cr.P.C. and resultantly the accused is acquitted.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
ST.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Sun, 05/22/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 07/14/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Jamaludeen K.P. vs A. Mani regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-V, Kollam
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanavas vs Sunil Lal regarding Offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS – V
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Kishore vs Lathika Kumari regarding offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS-V
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between T.S. Pradeep vs Suni Lal regarding Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS – V
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between R. Sreekumar vs Smt. Kavitha Venkideswaran regarding Offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class – V, Kollam
Criminal Case Defendant Won