Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
RENT CONTROL PETITION No. 32 OF 2018

Case between Sidhique et al vs Dineshan regarding eviction

Court
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. Jankish Narayanan
Order Date
2019-07-15
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Sidhique and others, are seeking eviction of the respondent, Dineshan, from a shop room owned by them. The respondent has been in arrears of rent and has sublet the premises without permission.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the eviction petition filed by the petitioners, ordering the respondent to vacate the shop room and pay the costs of the petition.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the respondent from the shop room and costs awarded to the petitioners
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners provided reliable evidence of the respondent's failure to pay rent and unauthorized subletting.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed with cost, as follows: 1 The respondent is hereby directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule shop room to the Petitioners within 2 months from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sidhique (57 years) Raheem (55 years) Farooque (45 years) Asharaf (50 years) Sabiya (52 years)

Defendants

Dineshan (50 years) Nellithala (H), Tirur amsom desom, P.O.Pookkayil

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Directed the respondent to give vacant possession of the petition schedule shop room to the Petitioners.
Evidence:
The respondent is hereby directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule shop room to the Petitioners within 2 months from today.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent shall pay the costs of the petition to the Petitioners.
Evidence:
The costs shall follow the event, hence the respondent shall pay the costs of the petition to the Petitioners.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the landlord-tenant relationship between the petitioners and the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Reported the condition of the shop room during inspection.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Commission Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Provided a visual representation related to the commission report.
Reference:
Ext.C2

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases