Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS No. 558/2024

Case between Shyla Beevi vs Rijeena et al regarding temporary injunction

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A
Order Date
2025-11-22
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Shyla Beevi, is seeking a temporary injunction against the defendants, Rijeena and Ansarudeen, to prevent them from demolishing the compound wall and infringing upon her rights related to the property. The defendants deny the allegations made by the petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court partially allowed the petition, modifying the interim injunction order to restrain the defendants from obstructing the petitioner's use of the disputed pathways until the suit is disposed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants restrained from using the plaint B schedule item No. 1 to 3 pathways.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court partially allowed the petition, modifying the interim injunction order to restrain the defendants from obstructing the petitioner's use of the disputed pathways until the suit is disposed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Petitioner demonstrated a potential likelihood of irreparable harm and a balance of convenience favoring her case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court inclined to modify the order stating that vacating the injunction will cause irreparable loss or injury to the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed in part. Interim injunction order is modified and hereby the respondents are restrained from causing any obstruction using of the plaint B schedule item No. 1 to 3 by the defendant or causing any damage therein till the disposal of the suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shyla Beevi
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rijeena
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ansarudeen
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Settlement deed No. 2633/1990, Land tax receipt dated 01/09/2023.
Defendants Documents
Certified Copy of Sale deed No. 1796/2021, Certified Copy of Sale deed No. 93/2022, Certified Copy of Sale deed No. 1661/2019, Certified Copy of Sale deed No. 1795/21, Certified Copy of Sale deed No. 1660/2019, Certified Copy of Settlement deed No. 2633/1990, Certified Copy of Settlement deed No. 1051/2006, Certified Copy of Partition deed No. 4594/1966, Certified Copy of Sale deed No. 2565/1953, Site approval and Building Permit No. BP/5710/2024.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R.Santhosh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Palathara Vinu Karunakaran
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Reshmi Raj R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajeswari J
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Monica Saji
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Malu A.M. Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sarayoo S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Haripriya S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Latheesh R.Prasad
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interim injunction order modified to restrain defendants from causing obstruction to plaint B schedule item No. 1 to 3.
Evidence:
the respondents are restrained from causing any obstruction using of the plaint B schedule item No. 1 to 3 by the defendant or causing any damage therein till the disposal of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of settlement deed No. 2633/1990 related to the property claim.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Land tax receipt issued from Kollam East Village.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Various certified copies of sale deeds and documents establishing defendant's claim.
Reference:
Ext.B1 to B11
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report prepared by Adv. Commissioner regarding property boundaries.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shyla Beevi vs Rijeena et al regarding temporary injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Shyla Beevi vs Rijeena et al regarding temporary injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won