Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 185/2024

Case between Shiju Paul Nadappattel et al vs Farooq Bin Firdous regarding compliance of rent control order

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-09-10
Duration
approximately-1 year 0 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Shiju Paul Nadappattel and Deepa Shiju, filed a case against the respondent, Farooq Bin Firdous, regarding non-compliance with a rent control order. The court found that the respondent failed to comply with the order to deposit rent arrears.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the respondent to comply with the rent control order and to vacate the premises due to non-compliance. Further proceedings in the rent control petition were closed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondent directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the earlier court order and did not show sufficient cause for non-compliance.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Shiju Paul Nadappattel (56 years years) Flat No.10K, DD Nest, Kathrikkadavu, Kaloor, Ernakulam, Kochi-682 026 Deepa Shiju (50 years years) Flat No.10K, DD Nest, Kathrikkadavu, Kaloor, Ernakulam, Kochi-682 026

Defendants

Farooq Bin Firdous (23 years years) Vathukkaparambil House, Mulavukadu P.O., Ernakulam-682504

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Directed the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases