Case Summary
The case involves a suit filed by the plaintiff for partition and fixation of boundary. The plaintiff was absent for the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit has been dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sheeladevi
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Lalkumar
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- G. Govindha Pillai
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nil
- Appearance Type
- Case between Sheeladevi vs Lalkumar regarding partition and fixation of boundary. > Case advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for want of prosecution due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent and no representation. Plaintiff is continuously absent and no representation as well. Hence suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sheeladevi vs Lalkumar regarding partition and fixation of boundary.
Case Code Year
Case between Sheeladevi vs Lalkumar regarding partition and fixation of boundary.