Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O. S. No. 286/2022

Case between Sharafudeen et al vs Divya P R regarding setting aside an exparte decree

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-11-24
Duration
approximately-2 years 1 day
Case Closed
Mon, 11/24/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves petitioners Sharafudeen and Kamarunnissa seeking to set aside an exparte decree passed against them in favor of the respondent Divya P R. The petitioners argue that they were unable to file their written statement in time due to pending documentation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition to set aside the exparte decree but imposed a cost of Rs.1000 on the petitioners.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petition allowed on condition of payment of Rs.1000/- to the respondents
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition to set aside the exparte decree but imposed a cost of Rs.1000 on the petitioners.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that sufficient opportunities were provided to the defendants to file their written statement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
On the perusal of the proceeding sheet, it is clear that there are sufficient opportunity given to the defendants to file a written statement.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the petition is allowed on the condition that the petitioner shall pay costs of Rs.1000/- to the respondents on or before 26/11/2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Divya P R
Party Age
35
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sharafudeen
Party Age
73
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kamarunnissa
Party Age
74
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Thomas John Morris
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Latheesh R. Prasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petition to set aside the exparte decree was allowed on the condition that costs are paid.
Evidence:
Hence, the petition is allowed on the condition that the petitioner shall pay costs of Rs.1000/- to the respondents on or before 26/11/2025.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sharafudeen et al vs Divya P R regarding setting aside an exparte decree
Case Code Year
Case between Sharafudeen et al vs Divya P R regarding setting aside an exparte decree

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Thu, 05/19/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 11/24/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won