Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 1026/2016

Case between Shanavas et al vs Sirabhanu et al regarding set aside a document and partition

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-11-18
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This suit is filed by the plaintiffs for set aside a document and partition under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The subject matter of this suit was settled between the parties in the mediation session.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms. The court fees paid by the Plaintiffs will be refunded.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fees paid by the Plaintiffs
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms. The court fees paid by the Plaintiffs will be refunded.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The compromise was accepted by both parties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I have gone through the compromise and I am satisfied that the parties had adjusted the plaint claim as a whole by the said compromise.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shanavas
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shameema
Party Age
48
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nissam
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sirabhanu
Party Age
45
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nissam
Party Age
48
Relation
H/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Salim
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nassar
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kabeer
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
None mentioned
Defendants Documents
None mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Abdul Azeez Y
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv.Aboobaker Kutty. A. & G.Prince Kumar.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in its terms as the parties had entered into a compromise.
Evidence:
Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shanavas et al vs Sirabhanu et al regarding set aside a document and partition
Case Code Year
Case between Shanavas et al vs Sirabhanu et al regarding set aside a document and partition

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won