Case Summary
Plaintiff Shahul Hameed filed a suit for injunction against defendant Kunheethu, but the suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Available
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction filed by the plaintiff was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for injunction. Counsel for plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Hence name of plaintiff is called. Absent. No representation. Hence suit is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shahul Hameed
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- Son of Muitheenkutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunheethu
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- Son of Kunhipocker
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shahul Hameed vs Kunheethu regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Shahul Hameed vs Kunheethu regarding injunction