Case Summary
This case involves a petition filed by Shafi Kurumpelil to amend a rent objection. The original petitioner, Jose Mathew, claimed that the rent was in arrears, but the parties had revised the rent agreement.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The petition to amend the objection filed by the respondent was dismissed by the court.
Key Reasoning:
The amendment sought was dismissed as it was considered an afterthought.
The amendment sought was dismissed as it was considered an afterthought.
Why Defendant Won:
The amendment sought was dismissed as it was considered an afterthought.
The amendment sought was dismissed as it was considered an afterthought.
Supporting Evidence
The amendment sought for is only an after thought.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result: The petition is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shafi Kurumpelil
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jose Mathew
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- B L Prasanth
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K Karjet
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Manu Nair
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The petition for amendment to correct the rent amount was dismissed.
Evidence:
The amendment sought for is only an after thought. In the result: The petition is dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shafi Kurumpelil vs Jose Mathew regarding amendment of rent objection
Case Code Year
Case between Shafi Kurumpelil vs Jose Mathew regarding amendment of rent objection