Case Summary
Aseena.P.M. filed a petition against Nirmal.C.Ani regarding a rent control matter. The petition was not pressed and was subsequently dismissed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed as it was not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Aseena.P.M.
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nirmal.C.Ani
- Party Age
- 27
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.Krishnakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.V.Krishnakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petition not pressed.
Evidence:
Petition not pressed. Hence dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Aseena.P.M. vs Nirmal.C.Ani regarding Rent Control.
Case Code Year
Case between Aseena.P.M. vs Nirmal.C.Ani regarding Rent Control.