Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 57/2025

Case between V.K. Raveendran vs Soumya Shyam regarding Rent Control

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-11-01
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a rent control petition filed by V.K. Raveendran against Soumya Shyam. Both parties reached a compromise, and the respondent surrendered possession of the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The mediation report was accepted, and the rent control petition was dismissed after all claims were settled between the parties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The mediation report was accepted, and the rent control petition was dismissed after all claims were settled between the parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
All claims settled between parties voluntarily.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
All claims settled between parties voluntarily.
Supporting Evidence
All parties entered into compromise voluntarily and signed by them.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence mediation report is accepted. Rent control petition is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
V.K. Raveendran
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Soumya Shyam
Party Age
39
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Nil
Defendants Documents
Nil

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Abraham P. George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Santhi.M
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sanil Kumar S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anna Jezita David
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Russel
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vismaya Venugopal
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anto Thomas Palatty
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
George Varghese
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Rent control petition is dismissed as all claims were settled between parties.
Evidence:
Hence mediation report is accepted. Rent control petition is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between V.K. Raveendran vs Soumya Shyam regarding Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between V.K. Raveendran vs Soumya Shyam regarding Rent Control

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Thykoodam Edavaka Cristeeya Sangam vs Anta Builders and Developers Private Limited regarding Rent Control
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Paul John Chakola et al vs M/s. P.K.Varughese and Company et al regarding Rent Control
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Suresh P., Subhadra Thampuran vs Zachariah Thomas T. regarding Rent Control
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between Antony Jain M.C. vs Mini Baby regarding Rent Control
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between V.K. Raveendran vs Soumya Shyam regarding Rent Control
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Defendant Won