Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 143/2022

Case between Thykoodam Edavaka Cristeeya Sangam vs Anta Builders and Developers Private Limited regarding Rent Control

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Sri. Reghunath N.S.
Order Date
2024-03-30
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Thykoodam Edavaka Cristeeya Sangam as the petitioner and Anta Builders and Developers Private Limited as the respondent. The dispute was resolved through mediation, with an agreement reached on the terms.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was allowed based on a mediation agreement. The compromise dated 27.02.2024 was accepted by the court.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed based on a mediation agreement. The compromise dated 27.02.2024 was accepted by the court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The mediation agreement was found lawful and accepted by the court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Heard on mediation agreement the terms of which are found lawful and hence accepted.

Judgment Evidence:

Petition is allowed in terms of compromised dated 27.02.2024.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thykoodam Edavaka Cristeeya Sangam
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anta Builders and Developers Private Limited
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Mediation report
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Lal K. Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Luxy T.A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Bibin Kumar R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Soumya T.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petition was allowed in terms of mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Petition is allowed in terms of compromised dated 27.02.2024.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Mediation Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court accepted the mediation agreement and deemed it lawful.
Reference:
Document Type: Compromise agreement
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
The petition was allowed in terms of the compromised dated 27.02.2024.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thykoodam Edavaka Cristeeya Sangam vs Anta Builders and Developers Private Limited regarding Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between Thykoodam Edavaka Cristeeya Sangam vs Anta Builders and Developers Private Limited regarding Rent Control

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between NAAJCO AUTOMOBILES P LIMITED vs Muhammed Yousef regarding dismissal of rent control petition
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between T.R. Santhi vs Priya M.R. regarding Rent Control
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between Mercy John vs K.A.Sandhakumary Suresh regarding rent control
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Mr. Thomas Jose Pallan vs Ms. Megha M.B. regarding Rent Control
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Bose John vs SNA Oushadhasala Pvt. Ltd et al regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Plaintiff Won